Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Degradation Threatening Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Past
One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”
A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.