🔗 Share this article

Ex-President Donald Trump has consistently expressed his desire to see critics investigated, exerting influence on the DOJ to prosecute ex FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"We cannot postpone any longer, it's damaging our reputation and credibility," the president wrote recently in a Truth Social message.

"I was impeached twice, and indicted me (five times!)" he said, referencing the multiple legal proceedings he encountered after departing the White House in 2021 and James's civil case.

Both have subsequently been charged, in cases that numerous experts have stated appear to be driven by politics and challenging to succeed in court.

But the latest allegations against a presidential opponent, ex national security adviser John Bolton, differ significantly, legal specialists and ex-prosecutors say.

"In my opinion, contrasting Bolton's case to James' is like comparing two different things," said Mark Lesko, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of New York.

This Specifics of the Legal Situation

Bolton has been formally charged on national allegations pertaining to the alleged mishandling of sensitive materials. Since leaving the White House in 2019, he has become a vocal presidential opponent, even to describe him "stunningly uninformed" and unfit for office in his memoir.

Experts say that while there may be political motivations to target Bolton, the methods used to obtain an charge and the evidence compiled against him suggest a possibly more substantial legal argument than the Justice Department brought against James.

"This misconduct that's being alleged is simultaneously more serious and appears to have occurred over a considerable duration," commented Carissa Byrne Hessick, a academic at the University of North Carolina School of Law.

During his time as Trump's security advisor, and following his 2019 White House exit, prosecutors claimed that Bolton placed the nation at risk by improperly retaining and transmitting classified information to relatives using insecure means, including AOL. Several of the materials were marked top secret.

The indictment states that at a certain time a hacker accessed to Bolton's account where files were kept and transmitted an seeming threat to cause "the biggest controversy since Hillary [Clinton]'s emails were released".

Bolton pleaded not guilty during a hearing on Friday to eighteen separate charges of mishandling sensitive materials.

Retribution or a Substantial Legal Argument?

The schedule of his charge - arriving on the heels of allegations against James - has revived questions about political pressure on the legal system.

Trump previously implied Bolton should be in jail, and called him a "disreputable person". Bolton, for his role, wrote a book about his time in the Trump government that was highly critical of the leader.

"Undoubtedly that the schedule of this charge, when combined with others, has raised doubts about the strength of these allegations, and the reason these charges are being brought at this time," said Jamil Jaffer, creator and director of the National Security Institute.

However, he added, "if the Justice Department is capable to prove the allegations alleged and show the information is properly designated, his behavior may certainly have broken the law".

Charging such a high-ranking figure for improperly handling sensitive materials is "rare" but not unprecedented, said Carrie Cordero, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

"Cases that concern classified information present difficulties to prosecute, but they may and are filed against both junior and high-level officials, from time to time," she explained.

Parallels to Examinations into Former President and President

Trump similarly faced charges of improperly keeping sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida and obstructing their recovery, but that case was eventually dismissed by a federal judge and negated by his re-election as leader.

A independent investigator additionally found that former President Joe Biden wrongfully maintained classified documents from his period as second-in-command, but did not prosecute him.

Bolton's case bears similarities to Trump's sensitive materials matters, said Mr Lesko, who also held a top security position at the DOJ.

Strict procedures govern the management of classified documents. To win a conviction, the prosecution must prove that Bolton knew the material he was sending was classified, and he had to intentionally transfer it to someone not entitled to receive it.

"Because of the classified character of the information at question in this case, we lack a great deal of details about why the government contends elements like the diary entries and the other material he shared by electronic message, and the reason there were classified," explained Mr Jaffer.

A Increasingly Traditional Legal Action

The process by which the Justice Department brought this case will be under scrutiny, after Trump openly posted his wish to see his political opponents charged and several of those charges came to fruition.

But Mr Lesko indicated in Bolton's situation, authorities seem to have adhered to protocol.

"The Bolton case and ultimately the indictment seemed to have observed the regular process including the regulations and standards within the Department of Justice," he stated.

Unlike Comey's brief, concise charge, Bolton's was a increasingly "traditional" filing that "explicitly outlines the details involving the facts and situation here," Mr Lesko commented.

"It appears fairly consistent with a series of cases... where public servants mishandled and shared sensitive information."